If senior advocates like R. K. Anand and I. U. Khan can be punished by a court of law, then why those hard core corrupt judges of the lower courts whose misconduct of corruption, fraud, and forgery have been proved beyond any shadow of doubt are not punished in India ? Even while well substantiated complaints are lodged, the superior court judges try to hide the crimes of lower court judges. As a glaring example just type “corrupt judge A. H. ANSARI” in the GOOGLE, and then click the “CONSUMER FORUM RACKET IN KANPUR” appearing at the top of the GOOGLE page and see how a consumer court judge, named Mr. A. H. ANSARI, played unthinkable fraud with the entire consumer justice system of India by operating a FAKE COMNSUMER COURT in broad day light not for one or two days, but for a prolonged period of about 7 months ( from August 2005 to March 2006) in the metropolitan Indian city of Kanpur by installing an unauthorized and heinously corrupt person (named RANVIR SINGH) on the coveted seat of Forum Judge.

http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/039consumer-justice039-c51082.html

The unauthorized ‘judge’ RANVIR SINGH in turn started operating the Kanpur (Rural) District Consumer Forum like a crime syndicate. He openly started demanded bribe from the plaintiff on each scheduled date, every month, in the Case No. 269/2000 registered there. When bribe was refused, the corrupt and fake judge collected bribe from those Ex-Pare O.Ps. who had jointly defied the court be returning the summons, and had not even ever filed their Written Statements. Thus those persons who had not fought their case eventually emerged as WIINERS. What a cruel joke in the name of ”CONSUMER JUSTICE” !

Despite being informed in writing ( substantiated with irrefutable and hard documentary evidences) the entire story of crime, corruption, and forgery in the consumer courts of Uttar Pradesh, the State Forum (UPSCDRC), at Lucknow ( headed by a High Court judge) and the National Forum (NCDRC), New Delhi (headed by a Supreme Court judge) deliberately took no action against the corrupt consumer court judges.

Whereas the U. S. Supreme Court says that judges who deliberately do not report the criminal activities of other judges they also become principals in the same criminal activity (18 U.S.C. Section 1 ). But in India there is no such provision. The corrupt judges in India are free to commit any degree of crime but police would not register any case against them, and other senior judges would also try to protect the corrupt ones. he case of corruption by two senior judges of India is a very-very small one as compared to the operation of fake consumer courts in the same country.

There is an urgent need to catch and punish the corrupt judges of India also as is done in the U. S.